In the Mediterranean region of France, several bridges are known as a “devil’s bridge”. Building a bridge in the Middle Ages was not easy and presumably subject to collapse during construction. To complete a bridge, as the legend goes, a builder would make a pact with the devil. Under the arrangement, the devil would allow the bridge to be completed and would get the first soul to cross the bridge as a reward. There’s more to this legend, that the reader can look up.
But in Corconne it’s not a devil’s bridge and it’s not man-made but rather a natural stone arch at the far end of a valley framed by imposing cliffs. There is no shortage of devil’s bridges in this area but there is also no lack of natural stone arches (e.g. the Pont d’Arc in the Ardèche spanning the Ardèche river, the ravin des Arcs in the Hérault department with at least 2 stone arches across a river bed). However, the “pont du Hasard” in Corconne is the only one I know of that doesn’t span a river.
uphill under the stone archthe path up the stone archanchored footholdsthe balconythe path up the ravine, viewed from abovehand rail
The route under the arch is equipped with handholds and steps anchored in the rock. Following the route we climb up a narrow, steep ravine under the arch, out of the valley and on to the Coutach plateau, but it’s not difficult or especially scary.
the rockfield view to Corconnecliffs along the valley
The “pont du hasard” is the first point of interest on this circuit. The second is the view from the castle/chapel on a promontory overlooking Corconne from a height of around 135 m. A third point of interest is the chaotic rockfield between km 2.5 and km 3.0 on the circuit.
Then, in the undergrowth or on the DFCI, the path becomes easy and somewhat boring until around km 5 where there are northside towards the southern foothills of the Cévennes and the town of Saint-Hippolyte-du-Fort. And finally, around km 9, along the downhill route off the plateau there are fine views to the south and to the Corconne vineyards.
In the Languedoc/Cévennes region, strange rocky outcrops and boulder fields are very common – a result of erosion affecting the limestone differently depending on its chemical composition. These rocky boulder fields include the Montpellier-le-Vieux site near Millau, the cirque de Mourèze in the Hérault, and the Païolive wood near Les Vans in the Gard. Although best-known, they’re far from the only ones. On walks in the Coutach near Sauve, on the Granzon plateau in Banne, near the Cocalière cave in Courry, or on the Gras plateau near Balazuc, we often encounter the same strange formations.
The « mer des rochers » near Sauve is a rocky boulder field on the edge of the Coutach plateau with a history of agricultural use. How to farm these rocky landscapes ? You have to remove the stones from the (rare) flat bottomed basins, and add retaining walls to keep the soil in place. Recall that this area is subject to intense episodes of rainfall in autumn and soil run off is a major problem. At the « mer des rochers » – easily accessible from the heights of the old village center – farming was intense until the 19th century, then gradually abandoned. All that remains are walls, gateway pillars without doors and footpaths. A castellas and the Château de Rocqueviaire (voir plus) also bear witness to the region’s rich past.
For this short walk, we leave the car in the parking area by the D999, on the left bank of the Vidourle below the village of Sauve, and set off at first to discover the fountain and the old village centre.
The “fountain” deserves an article of its own. At this place a subterranean river re-emerges from the base of a rock face. The Vidourle river, flowing above ground below the village, loses a considerable portion of water at an upstream “perte” (1) near the ruined Château de la Roquette in St-Hippolyte-du-Fort. The subterranean river has taken a circuitous route below the karst landscapes between St-Hippolyte and Sauve and rejoins the above ground river bed here in Sauve.
the Vidourle and the fountain outflowfountain outflowThe old village of Sauvefountain outflowfountain outflow
Flow volume varies considerably with the seasons. In February 2025, after the heavy rains at the beginning of the year, the water outflow is deafening. But in summer the fountain can be very quiet.
tour de Môle tower in Sauve
Next it’s uphill through the old village, where you can see a number of buildings that bear witness to former wealth (mint, town hall).
At the top of the village, a winding path leads up to the plateau. On this outing we followed the loop to the left towards Rocqueviaire (the gpx below suggests turning right but either way is fine). Along the way, you’ll see the Château de Rocqueviaire, then the Aven de Sauve (beware : no protective fence).
uphill to the plateaurock pillars everywhererock wallsa footpathnothing but rockspatterns of erosion in limestone
On this outing we couldn’t continue to the Grotte de Diou-lou-Garde because the owner had placed a chain across the path. Yes there are still private properties in this ocean of Rocks.
gatepost carvinggatepost carving4 o’clock on the sundialsundialbolder fieldbolder field
The path is fairly easy at first. In the last quarter of the loop, however, after observing the sundial, the walking gets a lot more difficult. You have to scramble up and down through a boulder field, using your hands frequently.
Finally, we head back down through the old village and departure point by crossing the Vidourle on a pedestrian footbridge downstream from the fountain.
(1) loss (or “perte” in french) refers to a place, usually in limestone or karst landscapes, where a portion of a river disappears underground.
Fontvieille in the Bouches du Rhône region is best known for its mills: Daudet’s mill in particular. Although he never owned the mill, he drew inspiration from it in his writings. In fact, Daudet frequently stayed at the nearby Château de Montauban, and was certainly familiar with the mill.
On this tour, however, it’s another mill that attracts our attention.
This is the mill or meunerie de Barbegal – in the commune of Fontvieille, some 3 km south of the Fontvieille windmills. The Barbegal mill was a grain mill dating back to Roman times, using water as a driving force. To bring water to the mill, the Romans built aqueducts, sometimes underground, sometimes overhead. One branch drew water from the northern Alpilles near Eygalières and ran along the north side of the massif via Saint-Rémy-de-Provence and Fontvieille. This branch of the aqueduct then bypassed the small Fontvieille massif to the west, returning eastwards to the milling site. A second aqueduct brought water from Le Paradou and Maussane areas. These 2 aqueducts met some 400 m north of the milling site. Continuing on, two parallel overhead aqueducts carry the water across a small valley over a distance of 300 m to the top of the hill on which the mill is located. Here, a breach cut into the rock brings the water to the southern side of the hill, where there were no fewer than 16 mills (two per level over eight levels and a difference in height of around 25 m). On the mill side, water was diverted into 2 canals to drive the mills’ paddle wheels.
ruins of gallo-roman aqueductruins of gallo-roman aqueductruins of gallo-roman aqueduct
Remains of the 2 parallel aqueducts can still be seen. Not much remains of the mill – just enough to strike the imagination.
Why 2 aqueducts? The one on the west side is diverted just before the mill by a canal serving Arles (7 km away). The one on the east side fed the mill. When you arrive at the hilltop, you can see the remains of a regulation system which enabled water to be diverted from the Arles channel to the mill or diverted the mill to Arles when the mill was not in use.
It seems obvious that this mill could not have operated all year round, as there would not have been enough grain, and maintenance would have been a problem due to limestone accretions in the canals.
Researchers have estimated that this mill could develop a power equivalent to 50 kw. It is considered to be largest known deployment of hydraulic power in the ancient world.
For this walk, we leave the car at the junction of the D82 and the road to Barbegal (location known as the Croix de Jousseaud). It is also possible to leave the car at the Roman aqueduct parking lot some 400 m further along the D82. The first part of the tour goes in search of remains of the aqueduct coming from Eygalières and Saint-Rémy. There are trenches, some underground canal entrances and a few small aqueducts. In some sections, the aqueducts seem to stretch for hundreds of meters underground. After a few kilometers, the trail branches off to the north to reach the Fontvieille windmills. There are 4 windmills on this circuit (the Daudet windmill, the Roucou windmill and 2 others). After the windmill sector, we head south again, crossing the small Fontvieille massif on well-maintained paths and arriving at the Vallée des Baux canal. In February, the canal is empty for maintenance. Refilling the canal take place around the beginning of March. After skirting the canal, we cross the D82 to head south and then west to the foot of the remains of the mill. From here, you have to climb over rubble and limestone slabs to reach the top and the cut-out in the rock for the water passage. Beyond, the remains of the 2 aqueducts come into view.
All that’s left now is to take a few photos and head back to the car.
A word of warning however. If you or your fellow hikers have balance problems, it’s advisable to start the tour of the meunerie from the north side (the aqueduct side). Climbing the meunerie hill through the rubble from the south side base requires a sure footing.
remains of the aqueductremains of the aqueductremains of the aqueductwater channel passage
When it comes to navigating a hiking trail, compared with 10 years ago we’re spoilt for choice. Numerous smartphone applications have carved out their niche since then. Visorando, VisuGPX, SityTrails, AllTrails are just the most well-known. These mobile applications – sometimes combined with a website – are often participative, allowing individuals to use trails posted by others: a kind of social network for hiking. You can plot trails on a map background, visualize routes, search for routes by region, and so on.
Before the emergence of these applications and sites, people used dedicated GPS-type handheld devices – similar to those in cars, but designed for use in the field, with pre-packaged maps and native functions in the device’s software. The aim of this short article is to propose a comparison between smartphone use and a Garmin GPSmap for navigating in the field and finding your way around etc.
The GPS device I’m referring to is the Garmin GPSMap 66, but the observations also apply to the 62 and 64.
Compare GPSMap vs Smartphone
Criterium
Garmin GPSMap
Smartphone
battery life
6-8 hr in normal use (tracking a walk)
depend on phone and screen usage time
battery type
2 standard AA 1.5 v batteries (removable); can use rechargeables
sealed in device
data and privacy
location and usage data totally private
location and usage data transmitted to tech giants and hundreds of data brokers
dedicated desktop app
Garmin Basecamp (Windows) or Garmin Express (web app)
not required
device build quality
excellent, resists 1 m falls and water (but not full immersion)
depends on phone and case
form
rounded form fitting the hand
slab
loading tacks
connect USB to laptop and use Basecamp or File explorer
download from source and open in app
maps : look like IGN 1:25000 blue maps ?
no
yes if available in mobile app
maps : other sources
OpenStreetMap
yes , depends on mobile app
maps : price
Garmin maps are expensive. ex. 200 to 300 € for full France coverage
free apart from eventual app subscription fee
maps : source
Garmin
via mobile app
maps : visual aspect
Garmin style with 5 level of detail
different map layers available depending on mobile app
maps:loading
loaded via micro sd card inserted in device
loaded in realtime if mobile network available or downloaded in advance
native software
Garmin software provided with device
varies depending on app chosen
needs mobile network
no
yes to stream maps while hiking
precision : altitude
barometric or map based
depends on gpss chip in phone
precision : location (long/lat)
3 metres
depends on gpss chip in phone
satnav networks accessible
gpss, glonass, galileo
gpss, glonass, galileo, +
screen brightness
good
depends on phone screen quality
software functions 1
follow track
yes
software functions 2
record track
yes
software functions 3
navigate to destination
depends on app
software functions 4
navigate on track
depends on app
software functions 5
view altitude profile forward and behind
depends on app
software functions other
full gps functions, sighting, compass, barometer, clock, bluetooth connection to pair with HRM, wifi connection to share tracks, etc
Which appliance to choose? This is very much a matter of taste. For long-distance routes through areas without network coverage, GPSMap will do the trick. For short outings in France, the phone will be preferable. If you’re a fan of IGN 1:25000 blue maps, you’ll want to go for the phone, because Garmin maps, while very readable, aren’t quite as “pretty”. Conversely, if you want a road companion that you can handle with just one hand, GPSMap is the way to go.
Final comment: If you don’t want to be geotagged by the tech giants and give priority to protecting your privacy, GPSMap will be your best choice.